Alan Dayley
2008-08-15 03:02:29 UTC
I have a very large directory tree that I want to archive on single
layer DVDs. I don't want to compress it or use the "split" command
because later I want to get to individual files on the discs without
having to copy or uncompress or recombine the archive. A simple
example is like this:
Base
|--dir1 (200MB)
|--dir2 (5,000MB)
|--dir3 (3,000MB)
|--dir4 (1,000MB)
|--dir5 (2,000MB)
\--dir6 (200MB)
The script or tool would copy this tree to something like:
Archive
|--Disc1
| \--Base
| |--dir1
| \--dir2-1
|--Disc2
| |--dir2-2
| \--dir3-1
\--Disc3
|--dir3-2
|--dir4
|--dir5
\--dir6
The solution need not match this exactly, just result in me not
needing to make division of tree moves myself. That would be painful.
Anyone ever heard of such a thing?
Alan
layer DVDs. I don't want to compress it or use the "split" command
because later I want to get to individual files on the discs without
having to copy or uncompress or recombine the archive. A simple
example is like this:
Base
|--dir1 (200MB)
|--dir2 (5,000MB)
|--dir3 (3,000MB)
|--dir4 (1,000MB)
|--dir5 (2,000MB)
\--dir6 (200MB)
The script or tool would copy this tree to something like:
Archive
|--Disc1
| \--Base
| |--dir1
| \--dir2-1
|--Disc2
| |--dir2-2
| \--dir3-1
\--Disc3
|--dir3-2
|--dir4
|--dir5
\--dir6
The solution need not match this exactly, just result in me not
needing to make division of tree moves myself. That would be painful.
Anyone ever heard of such a thing?
Alan